will highlight the; Officers to be ins m luncheon and Christ-|Mrs. Alton Wade, presi y to be given by mem-|Mrs. Ned Nebeker, ‘fi fet ‘Weber Basin Home-| president; Mrs. B. C Conde sociation Auxiliary. | second vice president; . Mrs.| is set for Saturday |Frank Moyes, secretary; t the Ogden Golf/Blake Holley. treasurer; |Hal Glenn, historian, ane Club. 1e pense will give Douglas ‘Steph and or working out learning more quickly than| The would be possible for one teach- ready | 4 orward-looking”* om new data. / teachin in They even meet Saturdays toler involved with a large class|with 3 001 District 2an ef-|plan, evaluate and discuss team ‘the education of|teaching methods and controls. ? |Last summer the seven particiisa question that may be|pated in a lengthy workshop, red accurately through aiand during the Christmas vacaed research pro-|' tion spent three full days devisspearheaded by the eo ceenaes to insure program ovement. Junior High School in) All team members agree that under the group teacher method, e pecially dedicated students discipline problems dischool answer minish to a great extent. They from their personal attribute this to the fact that iew with a loud and students recognize and understand the purposes for which peporen, superin- alone in the conventional way. | ments to accommodate almost| is method te more efficaciously used. THE LINEUPS Team members are: Mrrs,|and continue to Clarence Ledingham, Judith Jol-;rather we belief in it ey, Collene L. Keyes, and Melvin Peres English; Robert |‘ ie rnal Bench and Bruce | Griffin, social studies team. s new than of hims eat as it b that one drasof its ef- Dr. Boren said administrati ve |Tefined will prove required, and the tic revision in way of e in gh thinking on team teaching has effective ae for the mo completed in 1966) oon made since starting of the ed to supply much of method at Wahlquist in 1958. |¢its many toy : At first we thought that NO TEAMS concept would resulti hers in two y together program of social and teams |ing larger groups, are in-|we found that best: teach-|achieved with studies | even down to i | sa jar Assisting Learning mm depth which is|any size group from 150 to one | possible for fast-advancing stu- at any specific moment. dents is another satisfactory re-| Objectives of the project insult of the team method, accord-|clude the comparison of results education and psychol ing to Mr. Jarrett and his teach-|obtained by present and- ‘past iState University, and ers team teaching methods used jliam Slager,. professor A student who desires may|the Weber District, and a re lish, University of Utah read widely in supplemental|view of the logical sequence of Each is spending a texts including college books if|subject matter units and spe- of pSart a year on it fits into the general context cial suitability for such a teach- | of the work. LIMITS REMAIN | “He is not given a free hand| with no limits or guides, . the iccias we major field in education but is not pate any obstacles in his|in also an expert in some specific ie if he can absor ae: @ subject and can be utilized for large class lectures. This means that all teacher skills can be); e general,” eM I t theot Weber District has a ao projects Te pioneered in buildings |study will flexible space arrange- |and perhaps ¢ : t rest a ee idgR EN GRIN