DI wa) =e eh Bw ~; § t y Ch cn rae! oe tT WSU Supreme Court, useless body ruling been hanited hon prior to tation arises. As bebovclenily wise the elections rather than after the fact, it may have been viewed as credible attempt at reform. However, since this ruling represents nothing more than another attempt as the supreme court has portrayed to weaken the so-called “establishment” of student body officers and -by constitutional convention, not of mandamus” of last Tuesday that selectively voided certain student body elections, the WSU Supreme Courthas clearly demonstrated that cater to the cries of “foul” from Biff Whiting and his “crybaby coalition,” it cannot possibly be AKON To i editor, I thought I’d seen it all. Once again, the Weber State Universtiy Supreme Court has proven to the contrary. : "With its now infamous “writ _ | itself to be, I find it interesting that they collectively fail to realize there is a need for the WSU constitution - to be amended, it should be done by an activist court, politically accountable to one, that arrogantly — and illegally Tegislates Nabe the seriously. bench. : | Two wrongs do not make a | called attemptto establish a more those candidates who represent the immediately introduce legislation pure system of representation by delineating the student body into constituencies into which each stu- to dissolve this body, iin effect mak- electoral constituencies,by declaring those senate races which were since theoretically some students contested “null and void," encies whereas other students could fit into only one or two constituen- notonly itis a useless body, but also that ithas now become nothing but a petty forum of childish vengeance, — and an infantile demagoguery. Although laudable in its so- the su- preme court has done nothing but further bastardize itself. Had the right. The supreme court has Ideally, it would be sdmirable _ proven to all of us that it has no if student body elections here at productive purpose in the process. Weber State were administered ina I issue a call to the senators-elect to way that students voted only for ing it “null and void,” and return power to its rightful owners— the dent respectively falls. However, people and their democratically elected representatives. could fit into six or more constitu- Michael B. Clark, WSU Senior cies, the peer of equal represen- Whiting claims lo educate ‘would be’ senators _To the editor, Shacks Derek Lords for stand- _ ing and being counted. | : guess it’s up to da Biff to educate the “would don’t wanna be be but now senators,” Scott Why don’t you do some research before you display your creative writing skills or attempt to define rights at class action. Melinda majority of you white boys and girls said the results of the flawed election should stand. Now let’s test your rational ~Roylance asked the assembled group, who felt “wronged by the elections?” Only two people an- national students. There were a swered in the affirmative, myself Jensen and Delvon Bowhuis, about | a class action suit. First, let it be noted that if I had filed as an indi- © and an international student candi- — vidual, rather than as representing to butt out. You had decided not to _aclass, the results would have been _ join the class action. The next order of business should have been for the two of us to discuss remedies with the execu- the same. A fraudulent election is A FRAUDULENT ELECTION! Since the evidence persuaded the supreme court that the election was ~notrun according to the rules, ALL affected races would have been voided whether filed indi- I had vidually or as one person in a class of people who might have been wronged tion. to participate in the acoe Mr. Jensen did you note that three former candidates did not show up for the meeting thus choosing not to join the action. Your hyperbole that I dragged all of you into this is as fictitious as your bad bowlofchili. Both you and Bowhuis date. It was then time for all of you tive council. But noooo! Melinda decided to divert the ENTIRE PROCEEDING on the a question totally extraneous to the Supreme Court's decision, “Do you feel you were thinking. Their are about 300 intertotal of 1,147 votes cast in the election for international senator—not — 347, not 547, Nowhere not 847, BUT of WSU can thank the Lord that you two didn’t get elected. : _ And the rest of you wonld be politicos who can’t see THAT IT DOES MATTER, when voting fraud in the decisions did the supreme court ask Ms. - is committed, that it IS evidence of Roylance to takea pollonthe popu- — moral turpitude to demand that invalid elections be validated by larity of the decision. Anevilis AN EVIL! Whenthe U.S. Supreme Court, the model for the ASWSU Supreme Court, declared segregation to be _any method that suits you, be advised that there are some people on this campus who know right from: wrong and like a pit bull that has a illegal, I suppose you could have grip on your leg, we ain't going seem to believe that a class action. taken a poll among the white boys away wit petition cannot be filed unless all and found that they felt wronged by the decision of the court. So - potential members of the class are consulted. You’re at a university. _ 1,147!!! Doesn’t THAT strikethetwoofyou _ as justa little UNUSUAL! Just over | - 1,250 people voted in the past elec-_ | tion. YET IN THE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE CONSTITUENCIES 7357 VOIEs WERE CAST Doesn’t THAT strike you as some- | what unusual? If not, the students wronged by the decision of the court?" | | Melinda took and poll and the vast - a nen Biff Whiting 5 WSU Student ©