Xe J.M, & M.S. Browning Company and for - 3 technical (b) If 11 /4/A7 trade-mark someone infringement. else you could sue him for unfair trade-mark infringement, (ec) If someone "PN", you could sue technical trade-mark (d) If, in used used only the competition letters "F but not technical and not the design him for unfair infringement, the future, competition you should for the and use letters not only N", for the letters "F N" without the design, then your trade-mark regis~= tration would offer no protection but you would still have common law rights in the letters "F N" and you could protect those letters as a trade-mark under the law of unfair competition. This all means that if someone else uses all of the dominating features of a registrant's trade-mark, the registrant can sue both for unfair competition and for technical tradeemark infringement and if someone else uses only a part of the trade~ mark and "F N"), but not that part is an arbitrary thing (such then the registrant can sue under unfair for technical trade-mark infringement, as the letters competition I find no basis in the Lanham Act for the comment by the reviewer that "Trade-marks used in the Lanham must be used in a form even more closely following the registered design than under the old act." Possibly the reviewer had in mind the inadvisability of displaying with the mark the words "Reg. U. S&S. Pat. Off," unless the mark was substantially like the mark shown in the registration ~ for example, should you drop the portrait and use only the word "BROWNING" and display with the name "BROWNING" the words "Reg. U. S. Pat. Off.", you would be falsely marking, and this may prove serious. However, we are not faced with that problem here, but, if i trust that this will make the matter not, let me know and I will try again. Very /s/ TCLeF, truly T. Glay yours, Lindsey clear to you