SCHOLEFIELD, WELLS Mr. & BAXTER JamesP. Hume, 2 ganuary 27, i9hi hearing. In your letter you state that you talked to Major Thielecke and that it was entireiy proper for us to initiate the proceedings and to come down with facts and figures at the time agreed upon. Is it your understanding that we aré not to furnish them any of the information in advance of February 15th, or do you agree with me that it might. be weil to send on the information in advance ; is just one thing which occurs to the information is sent on to thing which you, as a lawyer, St. did ate tO recall it, as I do not me at the Louis and not like, believe we will ¢ Q February 15th date and send all of the data and thexy back here, sale Fase changes which might be That. is “one reason why we are méeting on the lith you sar for them to a day or so dif Lpdicingad, tidy ne e+e doesn't make at least<to nsation with Major Thielecke did he infer s just’ a preliminary date, or is my 3 though they do not have advance ye qan. come oe and in two or three days ten | first hearing. 1 can : 4 that it may mot be necessary : we Oh M-detail., In any event, | but it would make quite a wr a LO @ither wait around in St. hear ing from you as Oty Would greatly Chicago the week of February that the Februar : and confirm our what we plan on All de as soon appreciate appointment doing. of our judgment to Major ports Mr. letters to 6th, for it this sata. if, upon your you would phone Major February correspondence Mr. Williams and my reason for changing and upon in return to Thielecke 15th telling him just the past been with has is that unless there is some good Thielecke we shoudd address our re- Williams.