| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895--1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, A. J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; The Salt Lake Tribune; Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 215 |
| OCR Text |
Show or & THATCHER ROY D. THATCHER LE ROY B. YOUNG PAUL & YOUNG LAWYERS SECURITY BANK FIRST THATCHER BUILDING OGDEN,UTAH August 8, 1929 Committee on Enrollment Treasury Department Washington, D. C. Ret and Browning Disbarzent Arms Company, Ogcen, Utah and St. Louis, Eiesouri, Federal excise taxes on sale of firearms for the ealendar years L9S2-1935, inclusive. Gentlomens: Under Company executed date ite the above entitled of Salt Leake City, Ogden, known Utah. Internal power Revenue, to assessment the Collector of of that time, there taxpayer and the Thereafter of 12, 1925, attorney to Browning represent matter to Seymour Yells and and the undersigned, Roy D. Shortly to me, of December power thereafter, of attorney was or attached to the a in Lynn &. Baxter Thatcher, of exact date not "protest and objections filed excise tax” flied Internal Revenue, Arms it with the being Bureau December 16, 1925, with St. Louis, Missouri. At was no contingent fee agreement attorneys named or any of then. between Two claims for both the firm Thatcher of refund of were and filed Young, and of which I the rejected. om a member, made an agreement with the taxpayer to sue the Collector of Internal Revenue at &t. Louis, Kissouri, to recover the taxes paid. That agreement provided that for its services in the prosecution of the suit, the taxpayer would pay the firm a retainer of $2,000.00 and all out-of-pocket expenses plus 10% of any sum recovered. paid full. in agreement Thereafter sult was filed and it is now pending. Subsequent to the of Revenues Bureau nection with supplemental Internal the filing to The retainer has been in of grant accordance with the we us action, ea conference The conference was held, snd the matter. brief was later filed. No further action the requested in a has con- yet |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184222 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184222 |