| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895--1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, A. J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; The Salt Lake Tribune; Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 273 |
| OCR Text |
Show THATCHER ROY LE D. THATCHER ROY PAUL FIRST SECURITY THATCHER BANK BUILDING OGDEN,UTAH Counsel ie ba hing ton, of De ATTENTION: the of Bureau of Internal Revenue Ce A. T. Clark, Civil Dear Mr. 1939 14, March copy YOUNG LAWYERS B. YOUNG Chief & Esquire Division Clarks Ret The mail the decision this Browning morning of Arms Company Thomas 2 Eheehen, Excise Taxes the brought United us the States V. Collector PRENTICE-HALL Circuit Court Appeals Second Circuit rendered March 6 in the case in paragreph 5.256 of it ~ gr Smith v¥. Higgins, RENTICE-HALL Federal Tax ere the Rist there of 4{n er ny ae py by sustained as 1932 the of of the 1980 allowed of result a securities. made by him to Es baonnbetion, the stock was practically all owned by him, end the few shares were controlled by him. ting in the Browning case "purchase price which the paid ae a eredit on his obligation by which the Arms Company J. M. & for the recall, Will you That, , BM. & Browning Company arms which it bought. was the naid the means Browning The ease is elso interesting because ae ¢iifferentiates Gregory v. Helvering, 292 U. 8. 465, saying, ‘Though the case just mentioned is relied on by the government it is not of help not within to it for it hed to do with a pretended organization the involves know of scope of @ that Peal ie case rpm any The etatute. sale is to an Cirreuilt es Court in that decision we differs buyer." aetuel valuable ease present being the latest of Appeals. You re truly, THATCHER Roy & YOUNG D. Thatcher it |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184280 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184280 |