| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895--1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, A. J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; The Salt Lake Tribune; Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 83 |
| OCR Text |
Show for Memorandum Mr. 3, August Emrick 1940 pany as a separate corporation would be exempt from the tax but that the further requirement of filing a consolidated return would throw them right back into the classification of @ regular corporation. In other words, the gross income of the Browning and Company Arms the thereby their income pany status. 20% of than personal the of out them be more would B Company Bar taking com- holding As you know, we have from time to time prepared We have @ number of plans for discussion with Mr. Browning. always come back to the same conclusion that it would not be As a part the proper thing to do to liquidate the corporation. of this memorandum, we refer you to our memorandum for discussion dated December 7, 1939, which will be very interesting I am sure and may save you considerable work. Getting back to wishes advice, they Browning (a) the are Consider the of other questions upon which enumerated as follows: possibility a new corporation paid all of the into royalty of the formation which would Mr. be contracts. Just what effect would this have upon the in the light of the Young and Benzel decisions. parent company, Also would it involve placing a value upon the royalty contracts. If so, upon what past basis and would future (b) be Consider of used and what affect might it have years. the J. the possible partial liguidation M. & M. Browning Company ing in that tracts. company S. only the royalty leavcon- Our memorandum of December 7, 1939 covers this It would, of course, have to be brought up to date question. in the light of changed values since September 30, 1939 and any new data we might have on the tax situation generally. (c) Consider the consolidation of the Lindsay Land & Livestock Company and the Browning Arms Company. It appears that the Browning Arms Company may, through a recent contract with the Remington Arms Company, be in a position to go forward and make earnings in the future. The Bar B Company is heavily indebted to the parent company. Could some plan be worked out to take advantage of this situation. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184090 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184090 |