Walter G. Moyle, washington, Page # & en the to thought D. Esquire eg July purchaser were and it lacked important. some Accordingly, other in 19, details September, 1940 that we 1957, we filed a new claim, not an amendment of the old, It was re-+ jected, whereupon we filed the suit. The suit was filed within the time allowed if we might cownt from the rejection of the second claim, but too late if we must count from the date of the rejection of the first. In the file containing the protest and brief there is a memorandum very burridly put together for our own use in connection with the right to file the second claim and to count from its rejection, The suit is now pending on a motion to dismiss. I have asked for a stipulation permitting us to amend by alleging more in detail the defects in the first claim on which we rely for the right to file the second and count from its rejection. On October 4, suit, It was rejected jection are at the end | The 1959, on of application compromise the April 20, 1940, The offer and the the sundry correspondence file, we made re« to in- fix an offer a basis under to 619 was made formally to lr. Hoyt at the time the schedule of comparative prices in file No, 6 was furnished him. He was also given catalogs were the of the different manufacturers. Savage and Remington only competitors, as they are still, We were told by the Commissioner by letter that no written application was necessary. In answer to a question from us he said that the matter was being considered and nothing more was required, though we might furnish additional information if we wished, As we have previcusly advised you, the Bureau has taken te position that the Browning arms and books of is this Arms that the the Arms procedure Company is the importer and seller of all the department intends to make an audit of the company with a view to assessing the tax. which I understand postponed, you have succeeded was organized in It having | The Browning thereafter continued in of automatic shotguns, Arms Company active it was in 1927 and business as an importer and seller not organized for the purpose of taking title before the effective date of was financially Sle to pay and it did pay Arms Company in selling the arms conveyed the act. The parent the full price. The to it has not advertised