| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895--1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, A. J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; The Salt Lake Tribune; Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 106 |
| OCR Text |
Show Walter G. Moyle, Washington, Page Dy Esquire Ce #4 July 19, 1940 that it is acting as agent, but this point has not been raised, it has kept a detailed record of all sales and has remitted once each month for all sales made by it during the preceding month. A short time after the 1932 transaction it was found thet the Arms company needed additional capital, whereupon the parent company contributed $100,000.00 to it as a contribution to surplus. Apparently that has been adequate for its purposes. The position now taken by the Bureau the parent, and result that the the seller, If essarily follow cannot is that the sale from the I think they Arms companyto the agency agreement are to be ignored with the Arms company must be treated as the importer and that position should be sustained it would necthat all sales were taxable and the Commissioner fix a basis 64 L, Ed. under Section 619. Advance Opinions 321), are clearly wrong unless under recent decisions of the United States Supreme court in income tax matters all business transactions between arfiliated corporations must be disregarded. (See Higgins vs. Smith While we are not disposed to recommend that our give up the fight for the refund, unless you conclude is desirable to do so, we have been advised tha it t would clients that it be | willing to settle the entire matter, the suit and the you ought to know, basis the Bureau will fix a basis for all of the arms sold since the effective date of the act at the average of the Remington~-Savage jobbing prices. What that is appears in the schedule in nO. 6, we are ali There is another anxious that it matter which should not become and will fluctuate from and there every sell to public. if though of course, time to you may clsecuss the matter with the Bureau, Brownings are now about to conclude negotiations with Remington for a contract under which the latter will manufacture the Browning shotgum for sale in the United States. The initial price to Brownings will pro« bably be about $28.00 an arm as Remington's net price & short time to give you pay excise taxes, but it if this belleve it will will itself pay if advise us 6 contract be, the there 1s made Remington will excise taxes, is any information Yours truly, Roy Db. & YOUNG Thatcher is Browning further | THATCHER RDTsmr time to jobbers varies. We will be able in the exact amowmt on which Remington will will be close to the amount we mentioned, you reason Arms want and please to ii. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184113 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184113 |