| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895--1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, A. J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; The Salt Lake Tribune; Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 129 |
| OCR Text |
Show Commissioner of Internal evenue May £6, Page Twos Suit, you wrote 6, "Reference is made to your letter of February 1939, inquiring whether a determination has been in made February, of Revenue payment tid Ss us the as 1939, Browning be made trying to settle under section 619 {b) (2) of the 1932 which forma the basis for the on the sale of shot-guns by Jd. M. & Com PELLY You are advised ferred to the office of Toternal Revenue, may we were follows! price Act of of tax vhile 1940, s BGs Louis, Uissouri. that thie matter hes been reof the Chie of Vounsel, Bureau in order that ea determination as to. wheth er ‘Sect ‘lon hhal {b) (2 2) is Gat tan aylaad ales in Fy wpe pal <s ‘tax liabi lity tor the pericad in sult and for the period subsequent to that cevered by the suit,” oO Tar as we have been informed, no setion has since been taken by you; in fact, at ebout the time we submitted the offer of the Browning Arms Compeny to compromise the suit, we vere told in “ashington thet no action would be taken by you until the Department of dustice should come tap & conclusion sat re a age we: our bebeto« tO sottle, Aas we have gaid, the The J. M, is thus and M. &. Browning Yompany feels that there & but Gén now be no good reason «hy you should not make e deternination which vill apply te all of these concededly taxeble Sales, sO that it will be able to pay any balance of tax it may Owe; and if you should adopt the average ore cena res se price as the besie, there will be 4 considerable sum to be paid. Our is > client. in dependant upon your Gan Know the anount the positionof determinetion it oves, wanting te under statute the pay tax before ve have never clearly rig ddagebga way Fon ehoule not make the cetemination with respect to these sales, even thoug! the suit has not been tried, Now that the Department or Justi o¢ hes rejected our offer, so that there is now no possibility of "adjusting the tax liability for the period in suit", to guote from your letter of februery 13, 1939, may we not expect an eariy decision from you fixing the basis at the average RemingtonSevege wholesale price? If thet is done, the unpaid be lance of the tax computes on that basis will be promptly paid, |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184136 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184136 |