| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Ellis, Douglas B.; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Baxter, Gordon M.; Browning, Marriner A.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Paul; Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; Bar B. Company; Thatcher & Young, Lawyers; Russell, John E.; Russell, John E.; Zimmerman, Milford S.; Sheehan, Thomas J.; Bliss, D. S.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Benner, Alvin J.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); Emrick, H. B. |
| Contributors |
Harris, Kerr, Forster & Company; Moyle & Wilkinson, Attorneys & Counsellors; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; First National Bank; Browning Arms Company; Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Department of Justice; Hope, H. H; Bar B Company; Thatcher & Young, Lawyers; Benner, Mayors & Company |
| Description |
This folders contains correspondence primarily between Douglas B. Ellis, Roy D. Thatcher, Gordon M. Baxter, Walter G. Moyle, and John E. Russell regarding legal matters such as taxes, joint tenancy over stocks, and theft. |
| Subject |
Salt Lake Tribune (Firm); United States. Department of Justice; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Firearms--Taxation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; notes (documents); documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, St. Louis County, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184007 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq |
| Title |
Page 225 |
| OCR Text |
Show THATCHER ROY LE D. ROY PAUL THATCHER B. & YOUNG FIRST SECURITY THATCHER BANK dithy Civil Division Offiee of Chief Counsel for Bureau of internal Revenue the Ze Clark, Bf. D, C. Clarks it conferred LOEo nequire washington, Oar BUILDING OGDEN,UTAH J uly fe YOUNG LAWYERS Re; Browning Arms Compa v. ny Thomas J. Sheehan, Colleetor ~ Exelse taxes. ig now nearly a month since with you Er, about and learned this cage Lawrence Clayton that, because of your iiinmess, you had made no disposition of 1t, pectec to have your recommendations in the neands of partment of Justice within but the that have been well enough now, Our Glient is very you thirty to days, We sincerely accomplish anxious that this exe De. hope that by case should not go over the fall term. Thut is especially important to it, since the Departuent has taken the position thet ne adjustment will be made under can iso be serve notice gutter worked out when we him requiring Last on counsel to November, we and we still feel, the entire delay, tax that plead the to concede in our It is, to the for presented felt very (b) until therefore, the United in Washington paid, than mind, Section 619 adjusted, complaint it wnless you hag however, prefer the entire demand, finally to try it have You will appreciate, begin very shortly if to to compromise ls prepared before to it will make te Louls get the delay. no the end of doubt observed, to a refund of from the the ease long rather Having that probability decided to offer & compromise settlement and has authorisedue we Cah get together on a basis which seems to settle. ean we further as BOC, may at St. to you near strongly, would for refund intention that our client ig entitled Department client our States without the matter the claim substantial to be to discuss say that fair, it if will concessions. however, that negotiations will we are to have an opportunity be necessary to require an anewer. that belng the situation, will you not have the Eilndness to advise us at once whethor the Department is willingte discuss & Compromise settlement, and if so, what is the earliest pos~ sible date? We are again writing Mr. Lawrence Clayton with |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184232 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s68cxghq/184232 |