concerned ASWSC many stated, “Nor were many, ’s In reference to Bill McGaha sTue last in tor edi letter to the nge lle cha I Sir, st: day’s Signpo you! dent | feel badly that his stu government application resothers.” He gives the imp sion forms : he were misplaced and that sly iou Obv . ted tac was not con . ted mit com was an error t den However, to attack stu to and government as a whole, on personal attacks que; this being the reason tion in insert a large number of gerate. n The whole thing boils dow nce ere nsf tra the that to the fact r at of applications was poo elf. mys best. | experienced this in- he a posiwas not considered for He that nce people were refused a cha a him to. serve. I’ve told gexa to “million” times not totally dividual committees is uncalled for. n Mr. McGaha made mentio clit of his not being in the righ ASWSC. about students further s that However, the fact remain to any ASWSC is always open inget to ts wan student who volved. to 1 personally take offense and s Mr. McGaha’s inference His difhis attack on ASWSC. ficulty was unfortunate, but if per he is going to throw a tem es,” grap r “sou tantrum and cry re he is probably better off whe he is. My main purpose in respon is ding to Mr. McGaha’s article ent stud to assure the WSC nbody that ASWSC is concer work does and m ed about the for their benefit. as If applications don't work, in Mr. McGaha’s case, make . | guess some personal contacts it depends on one’s commit . rest inte of ree ment and deg Clint Wooley Former Candidate for Student Body Pres. ethics own questionable g that while the elections to d in bl er it wr l statin Editoria the involved in some of t as students ‘we ethics are over, tha throughout her confusion and campaigning are left with our ble una is she r, very, very eve So How future.” editorial. cal about a unsure long as students are not thi une ng thi any see to true. As camer as long as questioning the Signpost staff memb dy ing informed, and tbo be den stu on t las ed loy the emp l they don’t stil ple le whi involved in peo ng for paigni they vote criticizes k } ge see Ma who le ts Whi lis . rna are unclear, elections the paper. Jou know or issues that e of * those inking in wor le whi an ‘unsure e ice the ethics of som hav off to she is political they deserve to ng, gni ed ask pai y cam all in usu volved the media are future.”’ questionable their job (sic) Beverly Taggart blind to her own resign; most leave . her to ? se ics clo Eth se s. tho son rea l ethics or ica eth for ggi said For example, Ma I realize Professionalism? on e vot to EDITOR’S NOTE: dy rea was upset t she d sai o we apals students weren' gi and Mag ause ‘the we are not perfect campaign t tha have all Proposition One bec We . ism ut tic abo cri ed was all preciate your down” d ove “sh ng es, bei enc \nformation they receiv is really e sci con literatur our “Tt examined sure that Maggi of am I rge in its favor.” Also, s. cha oat r thr you our side of a n especially about conflict not fair that only one deny that she was see ial not ent ld pot wou I ’s .” er mb ted presen staff me button and two-sided issue was e he benefited wearing a campaign t ation about of interest. Becaus por orm sup inf in e e mor tur era ee, lit agr out paper or his g the sin pas m n fro bee in no way uld have hough the Alt . ate did Proposition One sho we feel he can ff of her ition, on the sta ts well in gi supported said pos Mag available to studen a leave of l e dua tak ivi to ind a d did not nee day. As helpful, al, loy , thy gn. He wor advance of voting pai ust cam he is ‘tr absence during the think it’s your kind, rteous, cou from reporter, don’t you d ly, cte tri end res fri informed? ve, was, however, that job to keep students ing cheerful, thrifty, bra dur nt, s die new obe d con har e sid writing nt,” he lost. I ere this rev Why was only one on and son an cle One printed period. Also, any per for candidate ‘sic’ you gn the cerning Proposition if pai cam der to won e an fre m de fro campus is the in(or for ice cho in the Signpost? Asi ed ir gn the ai of camp Bryan Steele the candidate won if you on editorial written by dividual on the staff) Signpost office to led © fai e st sid npo out . Sig ics the eth ng oni sti favoring it, que be would ormed. their own (5° torial keep the students inf ended your edi You of k lac the out Maggi points Dear Editor, I would like respond to editorial of those ics eth to