| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 010, Folder 08 |
| Creator |
Browning, John Val; Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; Browning, Ann; Browning, Carol Dean; Browning, Bruce W.; Browning, Judy; Williams, Harmon G.; Goesset, C.; DuFrasne, L.; Browning, Marriner Bigelow; Hoffschmidt, Edward J.; Schroeder, C. Edouard; Stephenson, W. S.; Dejace, P. |
| Description |
Exchanges, primarily between John Val Browning and Val Allen Browning. Includes correspondence regarding Belgian production as well as business strategy. |
| Subject |
Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-05 |
| Date |
1954 |
| Medium |
correspondence; documents; ephemera |
| Spatial Coverage |
Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; Herstal, Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; Seraing, Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; New York City, New York, United States; New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut, United States |
| Type |
Text; Image/StillImage |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng; fra |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non-profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information:  |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
Browning Arms Company Collection, MS492, Box 10, Folder 8, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s65tj323 |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
187580 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tj323 |
| Title |
Page 111 |
| OCR Text |
Show Discounts John Val Val A. Browning Browning October 2], 1954 In our discussions yesterday Big is in favor of a straight across-the-board # increase with possibly other concessions in addition to our biggest accounts, He has some good logic in favor of his arguments and has given it sant lot of thought. Nothing has been decided as yet and will not be without Cgiving great weight to any of your arguments, I might say that the danger of Starting a price war with our competitors seems greatly decreased when it is considered that we would not be reducing our retail price. On the contrary, we would be increasing it. Price wars start when the retail prices are reduced, Also, we co business directly with the dealers, and our small dealers’ good will is very important to us as has been demonstrated this year. Before the war one of our greatest sales advantages came from the fact that we gave the dealer more discount than our competitors and insisted upon his maintaining prices as far as we legally could. After the war the demand was such for all types of shotguns that we abandoned this policy and took more ourselves. If we give all dealers more discount, we will simply be reverting to our very advantageous sales policy of before the war. co As for alloting advertising budgets to any accounts whether big or small in of discounts, this is exceedingly difficult to control. Nearly always when a dealer in any locality advertises our guns, he advertises other guns and items along with them. It would be impossible This plan, however, can be utilized to advertise our guns exclusively in some case with Marshall Fields this year. You will great note many from my memo things which to be fair to the Executive Committee that and settled our you I have in all cases. some extent with big accounts who way or another such as has been the not in I left minds as out a yet. I would like to get any ideas which you and Bruce might have on subject of discounts, because if any change is made, it should be done before introduction of the Double Automatic. I realize that in the case of this gun our contract specifically sets forth a formula tying the retail price to the price we pay F.N. The question is whether if we raise our retail price enough to give the dealer F.N. would be an additional content to let 5% with no increase in profit the stay is? price as it to us, whether |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
187691 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tj323/187691 |