| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 005, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; Browning, John M.; Browning, Matthew S.; Browning, Marriner A.; Stone, Samuel M.; Penfield, Walter H.; Browning, John; Nebeker, Frank K.; Moore, F. R.; Smith, Lou P.; Wilson, Mahlon E.; Browning, J. Edmund; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Browning, J. E.; Teller, S. Jay; Colt's Manufacturing Company; Joassart, Gustave; Browning, Frank M.; Nichols, F. C.; Moore, F. T.; Blender, D. K.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Bidwell, N. W.; Bennett, E. G.; Roundy, Elva; Browning, Marriner Bigelow; Goddard, Grant F.; Benner, Alvin J. |
| Contributors |
Colt's Manufacturing Company; Nichols, F. C.; Browning, John; Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Browning Arms Company |
| Description |
Exchanges between Brownings with Colt's Manufacturing and Fabrique Nationale regarding licensing agreements, as well as documentation of the same. Includes some documents in French. |
| Subject |
Fabrique nationale automatic rifles; Firearms industry and trade; Browning Arms Company |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1898; 1902; 1903; 1904; 1905; 1906; 1907; 1908; 1909; 1910; 1911; 1912; 1913; 1914; 1915; 1916; 1917; 1918; 1919; 1920; 1921; 1922; 1923; 1924; 1925; 1926; 1927; 1928; 1929; 1930; 1931; 1932; 1933; 1934; 1935; 1936; 1937; 1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942; 1943; 1944; 1945; 1946; 1947; 1948; 1949; 1950; 1951 |
| Medium |
correspondence; documents; legal documents; notes (handwritten); ephemera; memorandums; financial records; receipts (financial records) |
| Spatial Coverage |
Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut, United States; London, England, United Kingdom; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Herstal, Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, United States; St. Louis, Missouri, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non-profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information:  |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 005, Folder 07, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
185732 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx |
| Title |
Page 161 |
| OCR Text |
Show owni ne Arms Reece Machine Co. States Circult Courts of and reported in 140 construed 2 contract The decided by the First Circuit Z Ae in Dente (N.S. CAra& ) Folding V a Frenw. Lek or 3 toe woth. CA question. upon here but the invent made upon thi tavensten. being for an indefinite afterwards made, are Bis improvements futAssis 2 reg he x i}, — contracts be to ions pris i for OL Cou The obligation i PS x Other bill > hand, whether based Other valuable considera such con +98oy Gus ensively made, and have peen doudt bed. un They are e tial to busine of the i : ot unjust. person may purchase nvention and. a very large sum, iventor, end proceed tO make use of it. not uncommon, ma 1 ‘ tly overaccordingto a practice thou small, may lap that invention by improvement s which, vila WD be snough, in these days of sharp compe tition, : x my igak speak * * a uccessful, host ile business. Pt. ont and reasonable, an d legal that contract Ss of SULT 6 ve ement 3 should be eben oe susta ined where th relate tT upon inventions alrea ay pure hes sed, ag oreen an ts tow one ~ -_, UL. C2 $ ac Sse ct be cS Cy fJe no te and the y Reece cas meen* | ar ty TeVi wed Fa ck Ha) . oF “ a CA whe A0 the corpora tion the : a> i / ; case of Birkey whe ob ted. contr any Er Ss Lay a e pew an La general Mf e) 3 cons _ © the terest in the in ne and. pa the an imp rovenent broad enough Jones Mie peAasAS | eee ch5 original inver 12tter were held © f hs 2. Reh J+ aus7 Daf Cu. act requi red the inventor other or Sei ter arta, im provements apc ee reed in bNe or 1Gtiche Patent, amauta or improvement in other ar tic Le whiich sada earp ore engaged in manuf fcusanine. 1% was held that the and rovVv were valid. th ig fat we lation de iadhe re to a WwW c to fu lly interval and. empl ore by means of or in any inure to for whi and improvem sharp deahant in on the orig tO include Company mented key i jer m9 cr i+ Cy a) $ \t. a ee I & oe Fe | fol Lowing L., doc brine: oy te Fy ds et ies re |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
185893 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx/185893 |