| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 005, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; Browning, John M.; Browning, Matthew S.; Browning, Marriner A.; Stone, Samuel M.; Penfield, Walter H.; Browning, John; Nebeker, Frank K.; Moore, F. R.; Smith, Lou P.; Wilson, Mahlon E.; Browning, J. Edmund; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Browning, J. E.; Teller, S. Jay; Colt's Manufacturing Company; Joassart, Gustave; Browning, Frank M.; Nichols, F. C.; Moore, F. T.; Blender, D. K.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Bidwell, N. W.; Bennett, E. G.; Roundy, Elva; Browning, Marriner Bigelow; Goddard, Grant F.; Benner, Alvin J. |
| Contributors |
Colt's Manufacturing Company; Nichols, F. C.; Browning, John; Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Browning Arms Company |
| Description |
Exchanges between Brownings with Colt's Manufacturing and Fabrique Nationale regarding licensing agreements, as well as documentation of the same. Includes some documents in French. |
| Subject |
Fabrique nationale automatic rifles; Firearms industry and trade; Browning Arms Company |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1898; 1902; 1903; 1904; 1905; 1906; 1907; 1908; 1909; 1910; 1911; 1912; 1913; 1914; 1915; 1916; 1917; 1918; 1919; 1920; 1921; 1922; 1923; 1924; 1925; 1926; 1927; 1928; 1929; 1930; 1931; 1932; 1933; 1934; 1935; 1936; 1937; 1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942; 1943; 1944; 1945; 1946; 1947; 1948; 1949; 1950; 1951 |
| Medium |
correspondence; documents; legal documents; notes (handwritten); ephemera; memorandums; financial records; receipts (financial records) |
| Spatial Coverage |
Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut, United States; London, England, United Kingdom; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Herstal, Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, United States; St. Louis, Missouri, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non-profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information:  |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 005, Folder 07, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
185732 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx |
| Title |
Page 206 |
| OCR Text |
Show THATCHER & YOUNG Lawyers Utah. Ogden, september J 6 Pat e ee Mi i 8 S s Brown ing Co 22,19 e . Gentlemen} I on certain have now obtained Reeulation firearms and machine guns and examination inorder to make at least a 88 relating have made a tenta baeies to taxes hurried report to you this morning. I have become thoroughly isfied that you cannot obtain a machine gun for experimental eaEpenes or any other purpose without.) making application for permit :and paying a tax of 3200.00, The act requires that to be’done whether the gun is sold, assigned, pledged, leased, loaned, given away, or otherwise disposed of, Manifestly the purpose of the act is to prevent as far as possible any person acquiring the possession of a machine gun except mS a under you the terms suggested to provided by Roy vossibly that the act, the manufacturer might deliver the firearm to its employee for its own purposes, I should think shat would be true... Thus Colts could undoubtedly move a machine gun from its factory to its Laboratory. there to be used by its employee in making investigations; and that surely would be true even though the laboratory I think, however, that any transaction might be in another state. by which the custody of the machine eun is transfert ‘ed from one person to another would be very carefully scrutinized by the covernment and would be approved only in cases where very clearly the transaction is bona fida within the Limits it have stated. For you to get a machine gun under those conditions would, 1 think, require that Colt's establish a laboraters here and emp Loy those who operate it. That , I assume, would be more expensive CoO and troublesome We than hope that we to paying give will be the the tax. matter further hie: to advise Yours truly, you attention finally during before THATCHER FS 3 tend ~ 2. ( Signe d) tT) PYTie F RDTP?E pDryw ROY 7 D. MTT AMOS D THATCHER |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
185938 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s6mw2mhx/185938 |