| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 011, Folder 07 |
| Creator |
McFarland, Lucille; Hartog, Dolores; Browning, Val A., 1895-1994; Browning, Marriner A.; Lindsey, Theodore Clay; Browning, Bigelow M.; Hagland, C. E.; United States. Department of Commerce; Baxter, Gordon M.; Brearley, J. A.; Steckel, Hugo; Browning, Matthew S.; Robillard, George N.; Russell, John E.; Haynes, Delos G.; Roemer, W. C.; United States. Patent and Trademark Office; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Goodrich, C. H.; Stone, S. M.; American Patent Law Association; Teller, S. Jay |
| Contributors |
Browning Arms Company; Lindsey and Prutzman; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Lindsey, Prutzman and Just; United States. Department of Commerce; Lindsey and Robillard; Haynes and Koenig; Lindsey, Theodore Clay; United States. Patent and Trademark Office; Colt's Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Co. |
| Description |
Patent work being discussed between Theodore Clay Lindsey and Marriner A. Browning, as well as the Department of Commerce United States Patent Office. |
| Subject |
United States. Patent and Trademark Office; Firearms--Laws and regulations; Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Colt's Patent Fire Arms Manufacturing Co. |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-05 |
| Date |
1929; 1930; 1931; 1932; 1933; 1934; 1935; 1936; 1937; 1938; 1939; 1940; 1941; 1942; 1943; 1944; 1945; 1946; 1947; 1948; 1949; 1950; 1951; 1952; 1953; 1954; 1955 |
| Medium |
correspondence; documents; financial records; notes (handwritten); schematic drawings; legal records; newspaper clippings |
| Spatial Coverage |
Cheyenne, Laramie County, Wyoming, United States; Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, United States; Farmington, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut, United States; Herstal, Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; Liege, Wallonia, Belgium; London, England; New Haven, New Haven County, Connecticut, United States; New York City, New York, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, United States; St. Louis, Missouri, United States; Washington, D.C., United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non-profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information:  |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
Browning Arms Company Collection, MS492, Box 11, Folder 7, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s656v3h7 |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
190532 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s656v3h7 |
| Title |
Page 51 |
| OCR Text |
Show Val. Ae Browning, Pres, With respect (c) --2, 2-21-50 to when licensed (d) tracts The made hereunder billed out, or for, paid usual provision shall or if if be not paid shot been with some been considered as having of interest in connection I think there ought to be is, puns billed out, before this.is all than right the so Ynited far as States, shot guns sold when to be then when delivered delivery." With respect to Paragraph 8 requiring every licensed shot gun with the name other have point being 4 and 6), in the con- "Licensed considered for shall sold (this Paragraphs definition F.N. F.N. to mark "Browning", sales Canada in and countries Mexico and FN. sales to you are concerned. However, you should not permit F.N. to sell licensed guns with the Browning trade-mark on them in this country unless those sales are to you. The same is true with respect to Canada and probably with respect to Mexico. It is all right for F.N. to sell in these three countries the same identical guns without the trade-mark "Browning" on them. There ought to be added to Paragraph 8 something along the "It understood is following ship into the licensed shot shall sell to "Browning", giving F.N. "Browning" With lines: and agreed and nothing or amyone on licensed respect that licensee will not United States of America, Canada or Mexico guns (excepting those which licensee licensors) bearing the name or trade-mark to herein else shot Paragraph shall be permission guns 11, in you considered to use said three probably the as word countries." realize that this paragraph or section obligates you jointly to defend F’.N.s from infringement over all the world. i think probably it is academic but you may be letting yourself in for considerable expenses I would suggest that you consider F.N. prosecuting infringers of our patents and defending itself against charges of infringement wise in the countries where F.N. sells, with respect to the United States, Now, with with respect to the marketing agreement, this has business matters than legal questions. I have only more to three points do (a) to and we Canada makes It might be well to strike out in Paragraph 1 phrase, "for importation to the United States North do like-~ and Mexico. America, its territories, Canada and the of Mexico," |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
190583 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s656v3h7/190583 |