om Fy a Semincton seant Arms CO. NOC EV-27 « attention. the foringa con ber éur ptemend Ses, in ter icaz ero mat Choth to y n r man dow e n k nt upo e we I b e ly, H sjl withPin Mr. ference ition of Sr. latest propes tookredupucithe ys to seims nfer ng ite royaltieege coolv edence of chour inv Browwening ursewhi Dicke, co d cla vent of order te help satisfy the all of n possession copy of vederson as early the on n had essiin nctothe posshad Nemiwas t ley Smi of tha possession nm fro a propositio Hemington) proposi~ Pederson's ke for a wiredentUr.we Dic @iecovered the azem toe our(beam cause . Pe and n,rson tiede its gun in per cents five 19£7, April, at wereDicthe ch we Nr. m the one t whi in character frolu ke n had her eit on tha si nc co the at d ve I arri discussing. ormed not been frank with ms or else “fr. Dicke had not been idf‘e nggton. miin for rk ng wo li nd hat has<been was pas ch inhe the whi im Die the cla of ter ke tus sta . the “Hr ut abo let r you in (You say somewhat aifferins instructions”. } certain under Springfieid the that me informed Dicke Mr. then and were engaged in drawing a eompleint. attorneys of Mr. Pedersen d cepy of a communication by those purporte e me Sent Wr. Dicke thie could be called an Srigvinel presume I him. to attorneys unknown to the practice of document a is It suit. before notices the looked was no cases patent where Courts, Pederal are upon as an extraordinary courtesy, It dowbtointenged, vic: a threat. ag it Dicxe me. seare would he thought be might It tried. tt I regariet? it appeared that Mr. On October cleventh 1 wrote Mr. Dicke to the effect that I had noticed in his correspondence he was undertaking to make the alleged Pederson claim work not omly in behalt of Pederson but also in behalf of Newington; that he was undertaking to make the that provide settlement on royalties pay to obligation Remin-*ton's the guna piration being mamfactured woulé cease and determine with the axI stated to ir, Pieke that all contracts of the patents. existing between te pey in his reply to me, seemingly undertakes Mr. Dieke, that my statement wae confined merely to the contract to for ss iong patents royalties time when believe the gun which of the wat now be in whether Pederson order that our it shall be on all the patent or Zemincton and Prowning recuireé xemington of the vorvell. as the guns were mamafactered, regardless expired, and I now state thie to you, ¥r. of nature that paid Semington there guns was claiming may be was an infringement. “Mr. Dicke discussion Browning's so manufacture That is not. and Browning. nO place takes one of the be misunderetanding claim mamfactured may eo that long after these as the difficulties right I In view about this, to state wish royalties shall manufactured, they are that exists expiration of the between