~z- Remington arms Neither !,. John guoceseors which Dec.k9-27, Browning if those commenced at nor Mathew successors an early =. did Browning not push would forwerd be proud in the of work date. i say these things to you in order that you may realize Browning Company is. not merely holding on te that which by ite founders, but thet it is pushing forward that work that the was dOne in up Co. an honorable, active way. The Browning Company is not win@ine ite affairs, but it is goins on, and each man interested in that Company ie at least somal responsibility. pany became J. Me Gnd an air of concerns The thought seems sort of an &. Browning; UH, could undertaking to have infantile assume that toward a patronizing to bear sone out organizetion other that people Company character; that his full lead that the Browning after and other and the the of perCom- deaths of business its present Company could owners be played with, favored and sometimes hilked; thet fecligsh sentiment would prevail over common sense in the administration of the Company, and I am inclined to think that one of the greatest mistakes made by your predecessor-in-office thoughts, You sey thet you do not was prompted by some of these arzree that the matter was Yightly handled by Remington. In this thought I concur with you, and I have made the above statements in order thet Remington may umieretend that Browning is a going concern, ready to deal with Remington on an honorable and even “generous” basis {to quote your letter), but at all i am not i do not Know tirely natural times personally whether or not. your on en equal acquainted letter I have of noticed with peculiar way. If you have any for, to quote to pases” that such some methods that have sound to core, Those methods you, and world. Let they prevail quite “hey are confined not Norvell. expressions that you appealed idea to understand i have I might as weil be practiced law for thirty other been and is en< phrases may he of the to in a rather I woulé established did not generally us each an Hr. twenty-third suggest ite your letter, “in the fuliness of time you will he convineed that the ordinary businesslike the you, December that give rise to the thought in my mind opinion that the Browning Company ean be abandonment, it will come footing. sither before very we are with throughout the civilised your eity or your estate, you and tell you that ae you me or with etart. frank years by experience start with quite as successfully appear to have done business. I am also familiar with a few alleged religious quotations, but I do not take very much stock in them. As someone hag said, “all generalities are untrue", ineluding the one [ have just stated. It seems somewhat paradoxical but [I believe the thought is worthy of consideration.