Dec eiG-Z27. CO. Arms Hemington -§~- 2 plaintiff against several eroes-billed each other and filea@ in the United States Gourts by defendants, and sometimes defendants Remington so better in their I sey Pederson. ageinet one of Dieke's expected that from quoted ficht and Hemincten {he word Browning that | letters.) were “partners” their heve would attorneys Pederson's them between existing difficalities the settle trethfully might we that ‘sartners" im had the crees-billes rather then that perhaps Browning and arose upon plaintiff; the important controversy upon the complaint of the wore suits sometimes that Dicke tir. to stated t also Ur. Dicke eomplaint ready and thet 1% would be filed immediately. and ft aia me, someti for it to i received no reply got my letter. <apperently the Springfield attorneys not wire requesting a reply. tir. Green finally wrote me that Mr. Licke Wes aWey, tata off. to the “ty the fallnese of time" 1 s0% a reply from Ur. Dicke and "irritated" at he would like te come Right here let me say that effect I have that me. see and out become Hr. Dieke (quoting your letteri, bat‘irritation"is a small thing ‘ven in medical ecience it is sometimes in the lawyer's life. Little things like that do not preliminary %°® a permanent cure. any I am ready to meet Mr. “Micke anywhere, any time, Upon count. of amount greet any from terms, ard he will not finé me puffering fellow the upon r, howeve I will wish on explenstion, “iyritetion". Matters: ing ‘hy l. tion as early so s@licitene S$. getting @1a@ they that the “restive” hae the claims Dicke inform me neys had informed him that end wag about to be filed, as why of Pederson’ cencerning “hy and Rewine- by informed constantly been Browning was Pederson that a proposi- had made Pedergon that iI9f£7° April, ‘thy has 2, ton as it concesled was been “emington Springfield Pedereon's complaint wae being and why was thet complaint not atterpreparec filed? es Can one ayoid the conclusion, from the cilreumstenc 4. as sont Pe@ter eith dly exist, that Nemington wae too frien Remington honorable, trying 5. to bluff Browning: 4¢ing business Are we open and "generous" and seek basis end in we al of Does 6. as even iteelf, think thet Remington . eg against Remington: oes Yemingten believe way, upon our past person- {quoting hide your letter], sbout Browning“= that an businesslixe telking mersly playing experiences? %. a cannot Browning is or are take run by care a