A * Di cke ® Ket etLwil? @ have informed me that Mr. Pederson was cetting restive. Your eorrespondence has indicated & considerable anxiety on his account, and yet you have told partnere in thie difficulty”. That the discussion Is this merely rownings and cated by any Browning a3 complainant versy me "that the Brownings (See your and letter Remington on the cross-complaint sometimes ecgainst you two is ui timately royalties On cease thought your Browning waged with other, on the upon the or is part some the of ¢rroneons both of about a these cuns. termination royalties. situation of Remington cross~bill expiration all an royalties either or not bring pay is 1927.) £9, compli- against know, Hr. Dicke, actions are started by or more defendants and the real contro~- permeates part are July quotation from your letter induees me to commence at a very logical point, and I em led to inquire: a Gifficulty between Pederson on one side and the dant && against another. in your proposition tO point out that the Browning patent expires Same Remington of one continue If you your as will of the Tiled by you take in i93t, patent. - & ‘hie misconception as Remington ¢efen- the ané pains that JI notice @mumunications. long one of a the thought fact. “he manufactures ‘The¢expiration of the patent does of the obligation of Remington to examine the contract mede by Browning and Remington you will see that I have eorrectly construed that contract, and I have no doubt that your conviction upon this subject will be absolute. Until I am informed that the Remington concedes the position of Browning upon this subject I do not believe it wonld be in order to discuss those features of yoar proposition which &re exclusively for Pederson’s benefit. it might well be that the proposition which you sent me in your letter of Ang gust ii, i927, would be perfectly satisfactory to Hemington if, by means of ani through that proposition, Remington conld terminate its obliz gation to pay royalties to Browning in 1932. when T Say to you that |neming ton will not be permitted to do this, then it may be thet Reming ton would not eare to join with Browning in accepting the Pederson proposition. I wonld not undertake to dictate wnat Remington shall Go relative to its part in these negotiations, but I do not hesitate to say to you that Browning will not concede that ent. royalties cease ané determine with the expiration of the patBrowning's position is and will be that royalties are to be paid by covered your Remington so long by the patent, letter I believe and this quoted ae will from Remington it make to shall elear the te effect mamufacture 7 you why that the guns I’ referred Browning and