~G6- Hemington arms Co, Dee.£9+27. I also stated to Nr. Dieke filed in the United States Courte by defendants, and sometimes defendants the important controversy arose upon that sometimes suite were a pleintif? areainst several croes<-billed each other and the cross-bilie rether than so Browning upon the complaint of the plaintit?; thet perhaps Browning and Remington had better settle the difficulties exieting between them that we micht truthielly ear that *partne ra” in their fisht agedneat Pedereon. ip quoted from one of Dicke'sa letters.) iL expected complaint resdy got my letter. that Pederson’s and Remington (The word attorneye would were _ “partners” | have and that it world be filed immediately. I reeeived no reply to it for Retry their. Ur. Mieke and I 41a not wire re: nesting & reply. Apparently the Springfield attorneys ijeaid@ off. Ur. Green finally wrote me that ir. rieke was away, and "in the fullness of time” i got & reply from or. Ticke to the effect thethe would ifke to eome out and see me. Hight here iet me aay thet iI heve become Mr. Dieke (¢ quoting your letter), but “irritation” in the laawyer's life. “ven in mee ice 1 seience it kane age ry $0 a permanent: eure. Little things county i am ready to nect Hr. Dicke any here, terms, “and he “irritetion”. ing matters: Le tion ae is is “irritated” at a emall thing semetimes lixe that do not any time, upon any will not find me su? fering from any creat amount of I will wish an explanation, however, upon the followaay early ae wee 1% April, concealed that Pederson had made a proposi- i9e77 &. “hy has Browning been constantly informed by “emington that Pederson vas setting “restive” and why has Remington heen sO s0licitous concerning the claime of |Pederson? 2. Why did Dicke neye had informed him that and wee ebout te be filed, inform me that the Springfield Federson's complaint was being and why was that complaint not attor- prepared filed? &. Can ene avoid the conclusion, from the clreumstances as they exiet, that Semineton was too friendly with Pedersen. "as Reming ton trying to blarf Srouning? 5. Ave we doing business in & businesslike way, upon an honorable, open and " generous” basis (quoting your letter}, or are we merely playing hide and sesk end telking about our past personal experiences? Se of itself, Hoes even 7. as 20e8 iening ton think that Browning cannot take esre against Remington? Sd Remington believe that Browning is run by a