or thereabouts. for the reéesoén Fiaintiff is Bs stated in eble subparagraph arms, with respect wes leyied, were L932, end they were date, On that date, and prior Revenue Act 1932, ali of J. of to not the sale imported by of the to them for en ecequate and valuable whieh wes peid at the of the and thence hitherto, or interest in any thereor, nor which saic tex such Skies the sales the with AQy to the the amount rire dune Of America Brovning date ic, on of in consideration, that the pleintirr, Company tax soid good alii of Gelivery of the hes hed mo right, titie in any of the gales with re- levied, nor exeept oniy es to its of any pleintiff or sales factor, in the mentioned in this flrearms; proceeds which the said texes were levied. Neither the plaintiff nor ds & Me ©. Browming pert thereof, iu the they Imposed, ineluced said price the articles with collected the taxes, or respect emount of seid thereof, them, but the whele thereof from eny hes been ebsorbed by the taxpayer. Plaintiff is informed to shortiy be that L932, was made, the vendee, meking an exeige tax return, ds were pert or facts which any. vencdees the to or the alleges of any Ms texzes, from ll, nine, to hes of Beparagraph respect Compeny or prior by exact acles. (e) are M. & Me &. agent mentioned wOre , end as last the effective faith commissions of the the was 411 566 to to {c). bed delivered spect the piaintif© and the state which « time to and bélieves after Us. & Me filed with &. the sale Browning the and therefore of June 18 Compeny, in Collector of Internal Revenue, predecessor of the defendant, at st. Louis, Missouri, an effidavit on its behalf made by dohm browning, its vice president,