oe either the taxpayer nor gd. M. &M, &. Browning has included said taxes, or any part thereof, in Company the price of the articles with imposed, or collected the thereof, from the vendees thereof hes been absorbed On refund at St. ef April said Loule, was denied. were defects 6, taxes Biseourl, to which they were amount of said taxes, or or from any of them, but by the taxpayer. 1956, with respect the the taxpayer Collector Qn July 17, filed of 1936, any the e cleim Internal the part whole for Revenue saic claim The texpayer files this claim believing there in the former cleim which right prejudice ite Case. the Prior to the assessment taxpayer and Of J. kh. & &, &, of representatives examined by sesessed upon of this tax, the Browning Company Treasury the books were of and Department, the tax was shortly thereafter essessed, The taxpayer is ot able to segrege se the tax exactiy into that assessed upon the sale of arms gold by 1t tod, &. & &. &. Browning Company before the effective date of the Revemme Aot of 1932, ang that sales of arms Later imported by that company, for the reason that it has not aseess to the work sheets of the treasury representatives and, without them, is unable to recontile ite records with the information it received from the Treesury Department. 4s a result, it has been ¢om-~ pelied to approximate the segregations The taxpayer therefore requests that t be refunded geid sum so paid under protest in the amount o $76,491.54, with interest from date of payment according to law, or such exester amount ae is legally refundable. Prompt ection on thie claim is respectifully request~ SC. refund Signed besring and even affixed dats, this to the __ taxpayer's elaim day of August, “FicsARESPresident CORPANT BROWNING for 1967,