| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 10 |
| Creator |
Baxter, Gordon M.; Ellis, Doug B.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Browning Arms Company; Pinckney, G. E.; Browning, Marriner A.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Berry, Wendell; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; District Court of Missouri |
| Contributors |
Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Browning Arms Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Remington Arms Company; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company |
| Description |
This folder contains correspondence between Walter G. Moyle, Roy D. Thatcher, and Marriner A. Browning about the tax excise court case. It also contains legal documents and financial records related to the Browning Arms Company. |
| Subject |
Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Remington Arms Company; Firearms--Taxation--Law and legislation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1940; 1941 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; legal records; documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 10, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184436 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Title |
Page 150 |
| OCR Text |
Show natural person so and broad done, Of or so filled course, to whether there that something not ig sequences, of the of of a fact else the held open pitfalls that it should grant relief where it be is will always incauire a sale, It goes without saying is mascuerading as a sale and any con-~ should not attach those which follow from the real pace of the ennotation, Thus, it of war there a wags stockholder, no loss stockholderts very properly, in eases plan whith involves it can where the be said not intended Gid not create a loss, way not follows but whatever to tax saving, the courts heve deprive the income the that the tax. *; is but a part of the same se- purported of consequences be has sale the owner may it deductible repurchase was to 609 nature was found that there wae no property to a corporation vendor that on the that not they computing so field and in curity, a courts "But where fide sale which to the fact, except been and is in is will freud, transection. bona with prevent in one corporation, courts hecessary if another the the of sale property, a real. sotive universally or sale with respect recognized a corporation and its sole stockholder as able and sell from each other with all the resulting follow were they in way related, to buy consequences that woule separate no entities, |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184586 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c/184586 |