in which sola was said outlined ermus to it the entire ane by which transaction the shortly theresfter, representatives Revenue, whose neues are the fects, whereupon, gation of Lieves, the Séle was made that the ¢, Me & M. ays SO of Commissic in sold, eny and thereaiter as ite agent, het of 19326 to out in that it be in Browning thereo?, from thereo!l gSegrcegate Claimed was the the hereof, in seid was arms or through exeise or defective effect, or y at or any vert. respect to hich amount of taxes, them, ssid or from any been absorbed by the taxpayer, of © from on edditiconal taxes are aecditions to e@licged the orice payments salee to and upon Made admitted be whi importer mde and Revenue % 8, therecf, they were or any pert but the whole i+ eleo failed GR. account to this, ail, Se on taxable Tire- end M. said taxes, vendees be ' the the in 4. the to se x J. with the Septenbe: nor articles be- 6, plaintiff the and plaintiff under pa not or the tax April fatally substanee included the ov theretefore neither hee the of filed that thet sales claim ¢ither ruled producer copy Seven informed manufacturer, ary investi- ali the of is the to plaintirr = Company subject asséesed besed. in directly taxes be end it, edditionel trary Revenue filed colleeted has internal elaim of or an Plaintiff's eis imposed, by plaintiff wade , lZe not, the price thet Bureau Inte not Sompeny Fed not the seresnent pleintiff was which of were of alietcge out was the te as Browning made Paregraph Gid &. and to faith egency of known f good thereof, ferred not by be sales 3 te