| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 10 |
| Creator |
Baxter, Gordon M.; Ellis, Doug B.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Browning Arms Company; Pinckney, G. E.; Browning, Marriner A.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Berry, Wendell; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; District Court of Missouri |
| Contributors |
Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Browning Arms Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Remington Arms Company; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company |
| Description |
This folder contains correspondence between Walter G. Moyle, Roy D. Thatcher, and Marriner A. Browning about the tax excise court case. It also contains legal documents and financial records related to the Browning Arms Company. |
| Subject |
Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Remington Arms Company; Firearms--Taxation--Law and legislation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1940; 1941 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; legal records; documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 10, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184436 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Title |
Page 151 |
| OCR Text |
Show Because case is always decision, and endeavor to of decided them renainder knowledge order to to decision separate some before being new Some of a stockholder, cases our facts in a what is the we shall the facts, a few was written, the not because determine from dictum, including former involved brief cases. them are referred the relationships but because into the realm and is in corporations, the in analyze extends of necessary nvolving for a they of to between show a the a general are corporation and doctrine organizations fact they we other than rule, Planters! Cotton O11 Co., v, Collector, 53 Fed, £4 825, Hopkins, by the Circuit Circuit. There a allowance to was decided the of Appeals of the corporate taxpayer sought to proeure cerporation for previous year the Court contend income tax Fifth purposes the of a of which was the owner agsceiaticn and of association by an One Chapnan loss sustained the texpayer was the successor, of substantially all the stock It was urged by Chapmen thet the and allowed in favor of corporation, corporation, be carried over any sinee in of court the tion event is the valuable loss of the would be we shall and the loss should his, The ciscussion quete a part of "(3) It 1s the geners] rule that the corpora~ and the stockholders are essentially it. distinct the |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184587 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c/184587 |