ss r = oon that there may shotguns whieh to be some special patented Browning Arms Company is features on exclusively these entitled sell, t will send you, on Monday, & copy of the memorandum which I am filing with Mr, Hoyt. He will no doubt repeat the vecunst he made to me a few days ago that I furnish him with a copy of the contract, which I do not specifically refer to in my memorandum. t wish, therefore, that you would let me have your ideas on this subject and advise te to what extent the shotguns now being manufactured Tor Browning Aras Company involve Browning patents, which ar not available ite own that On page 2 of your letter of all of the Browning patents pired on the guns manufaotured by Remington | use. and that Remington and Tor November 9, 1940, you stated used in these guns haye ¢x~ Savage both use the basic Browning invention in their shotguns. 1 Bad previously jugged from the contents of your letter that the present Srowning shotgun was virtuaily a duplicate of the gun which Remington manuractured and solid to its own customers, It seems that this case has no end of complications. So far as my present memorandum is concerned I merely want to point out that a settlement of the present ease would be no precedent to future Browning operations. Kr, Hoyt had indi-+ cated that if the present case was a “dead horse” in that respect it would make considerable differences in his attitude. With kind personal regards, SLneerely Walter la/bd Ge Mr. Gordon M. Bexter yours, G. Moyle (sad)