| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 10 |
| Creator |
Baxter, Gordon M.; Ellis, Doug B.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Browning Arms Company; Pinckney, G. E.; Browning, Marriner A.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Berry, Wendell; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; District Court of Missouri |
| Contributors |
Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Browning Arms Company; Moyle & Wilkinson Attorneys & Counsellors; Thatcher & Young Lawyers; Remington Arms Company; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company |
| Description |
This folder contains correspondence between Walter G. Moyle, Roy D. Thatcher, and Marriner A. Browning about the tax excise court case. It also contains legal documents and financial records related to the Browning Arms Company. |
| Subject |
Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Remington Arms Company; Firearms--Taxation--Law and legislation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1940; 1941 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; legal records; documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 10, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184436 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Title |
Page 153 |
| OCR Text |
Show The court also said, as bas been said so many "The rights of the claimants here must rest times: upon the express terms no naturel spring.” So must rest by those during we upon here the express express the or terme They have | period to the the statute; be United States and since, taxable, must be made the Act, and by an importer, claim the United sales made to give and the wife each of the of of a sale, producer, statute. rights of States fail. Commissioner $0 Fed. wis the ; the terms, effective anufseturer must say of a relief cage from v. (CCA involving the validity income taxes, The head independent and selling means and the proceeds of the the same securities, securities, kind of ealee were deducted tained as valid. the sale from The "Provided takes Behan, #d 609, of husband encased to Zach one to time the an actual some other, The extent sold, he who used losses income, court. property b), in buying furnished them sustained 6 deductions to buy in these were sus< said} sale does onatirely out of take place which the reach of the eeller, it canriot matter whether the purchaser is one Pit another, * * * Nor ean either of these sellers be justly condemned because they acted lawfully to take advantage tained losses. of the privilege Presumably right is sufficient of the right.*® the of deducting law justification sus~ which eives for exercise the the |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184589 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c/184589 |