| Title |
Browning Arms Company Collection, Box 003, Folder 10 |
| Creator |
Baxter, Gordon M.; Ellis, Douglas B.; Moyle, Walter G.; Thatcher, Roy D.; Browning Arms Company; Pinckney, G. E.; Browning, Marriner A.; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company; Berry, Wendell; Thatcher & Young, Lawyers; District Court of Missouri |
| Contributors |
Scholefield, Wells & Baxter; Browning Arms Company; Moyle & Wilkinson, Attorneys & Counsellors; Thatcher & Young, Lawyers; Remington Arms Company; J. M. & M. S. Browning Company |
| Description |
This folder contains correspondence between Walter G. Moyle, Roy D. Thatcher, and Marriner A. Browning about the tax excise court case. It also contains legal documents and financial records related to the Browning Arms Company. |
| Subject |
Firearms industry and trade--United States; Firearms industry and trade--Utah; Browning Arms Company; Business enterprises--Utah--Ogden--History; Remington Arms Company; Firearms--Taxation--Law and legislation |
| Digital Publisher |
Digitized by Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Date Digital |
2026-02 |
| Date |
1940; 1941 |
| Medium |
correspondence; financial records; legal records; documents |
| Spatial Coverage |
St. Louis, Missouri, United States; Ogden, Weber County, Utah, United States; Washington, D.C., United States; Bridgeport, Fairfield County, Connecticut, United States |
| Type |
Text |
| Conversion Specifications |
Archived TIFF images were scanned with an Epson Expression 13000XL scanner. Digital images were reformatted in Photoshop. |
| Language |
eng |
| Rights |
Materials may be used for non--profit and educational purposes; please credit Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. For further information: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC--EDU/1.0/ |
| Sponsorship/Funding |
Funding generously provided by the Val A. Browning Charitable Foundation. |
| Source |
MS492, Box 3, Folder 10, Special Collections & University Archives, Stewart Library, Weber State University. |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184436 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c |
| Title |
Page 174 |
| OCR Text |
Show than through arm's length transactions," affiliated corporetions, Many tions to the of is designed Known Section 619 against efforts & low in price of to to buyers This, between the manufacturing corpora} the brief follow that procedure, proper tax a fair to reduce and the amount by price, can be controlled on no doubt, is the reason ali Bourjols case conceded that the tax was being in queation, This tase with approval in is sale of secure taxpayers the who the alone writer is eited why the sales the at parties due, the were heid amount webber v,. Knox, OF Fed. 2 G21, where the sole to be separate the separation stockholder entities, be and the though ignered, It Luzier's, Ine. corporation the taxpayer is alse v. Ree, cited urged and that distinguished in 24 where it is said Supp. 611, of the Bourjois case, "The merchandise was sold by the manufacturer sales corporation and the actusal title passed to the to the sales The tax Fed, corporation, ® case which involves directly the validity for purposes of a sale by a corporation to its wholly owned subsidiary, and which is the we have found where question carefully decided is is only discussed case and - the |
| Format |
application/pdf |
| Setname |
wsu_ba |
| ID |
184610 |
| Reference URL |
https://digital.weber.edu/ark:/87278/s65tfk5c/184610 |