OCR Text |
Show Final Elections Due April 15,16 of the primary The results election are final elections ballots the in, haave been prepared, and all signs are go for the ASWSC Wednesday to held be and Thursday. The primary race for Presi- dent was mainly between Steve Largent, Lori Memmott and Clint Woolley, as shown by the final tally. Largent received 181 votes to finish first, with Memmott following at 173 and Woolley at 161. Largent and Memmott held this morning in the Union Building lobby at 11. 0’clock. All candidates will speak for two minutes, after which ques- tions from the audience will be answered. The winners of the election will be announced at a party in the ASWSC offices Thursday evening between 8:30 and 9. Everyone is invited to attend to congratulate the winners and console the losers. now move on to the final elec- | tion. Jeff Stuart with finished fourth 115 votes, barely edging out John Dawson who ended with 114. In the race for Public Rela- Faye tions Vice-president, 274 with first hed Hardy finis votes. The real race here was for second place, with Jeff defeating narrowly Hoerr Heather ie fe 3% Tuttle by the margin of 218 to 213. The other races to be decided this week are as follows: Bruce VP, Executive Richeson v. Bret England; Dave VP, Academic wick; South Rick v. Cook Richard VP, Cultural Hackwell v. John Johnson. Tammy Hamer is running unopposed for Activities VP, and Stephanie DeGraw has no opponent in the race for Student Services VP. Voters will also be deciding amendproposed three on ituconst C ASWS ments to the tion. They are discussed in depth in an article on page 6 of today’s Signpost. To assist students in their decisions, a speakout will be oe raisin oper ee REVELANT DECORATION O R mean in gless clutter? Students and administra tor S, faculty and candidates fail to agree on the n ew election rules which allow for this typ e of campaigning. Election clutter attracts comment Whether turnout they hel in last week’s ed th oe no one seems to know. But the sight of election posters and banners strewn across campus drew favorable comments from those directly involved in the elections and generally unfavorable comments from those not involved. The decorated ( cam pus was made possible by this year’s relaxed election rules, which withdrew many limitations on Campaigning. “The mess is hideous,”’ said one female student. ‘There Should be one designated place for posters.” But Karl Wood Associate Director of the Union Building and an election advisor, said he is glad to see this type of Campaigning, an Opinion echoed by several candidates. Other Utah colleges have strict rules concerning the makeup and placement of posters. |