TO: Private Board FROM: Richard Daan: duly SUBJECT: and Public Sectors of the Ogden Community Action Agency of Trustees A. Frye, Private Citizen 3f,<1975 Response to the letter from of Trustees, dated July 28, Planned Activities) Seven Low-Income 1975 (Richard A. Members of the CAA Board Frye Activities and This communication is in response to the subject letter which some of your fellow board members saw fit to sign due to their apparent ignorance of the facts. This was due to the lack of sufficient information being presented to them and not allowing them time to investigate the validity of what was made available to them. Why are the low-income board members always the ones to sign these types of letters? Why do not the public and private sectors members of the board ever sign these types of letters? If you will notice, there is one blank line at the bottom of the page. This leads me to believe that one of the low-income. board members questioned the validity of the letter. Thus, the "from" section on the letter is incorrect. It would seem that if any other low-income board member would have exercised the intelligence, that I know they possess, and asked for proof of the allegations presented to them by Mr. Massey, I don't believe, in good conscience, they would have signed this type of letter. I question the ethical and professional manner in which Mr. Massey addressed himself to this particular situation. Is this his typical "modus operandi"? If Mr. Massey would have inquired of me or my employer the nature of my employment, I or my employer would have been more than happy to respond either in public or private to him. I can not understand an individual in Mr. Massey's position making false statements to board members and requesting their signature on such a better... In attempting to answer the memorandum I find it very hard to address myself to what I would label as "garbage". The memorandum is typical of that produced by the so called "hard working Community Action Agency Executive Director." It is full of innuendos, typographical and grammatical errors and nonsensical allegations, which in my opinion, has become a trademark of the Community Action Agency Administration. You would think that at least one of the low-income board members, who signed the allegations, could have done so without the prompting of Community Action Agency staff. I wonder what they call or how they describe their infamous memorandum if it is not back-stabbing and an effort to debase and undermine my character. Are they not guilty of the "crime" which they accuse me? There 1. are a few points I would like to clear up: Richard A. Frye did not bring to the attention of the signators of the allegations that he would be employed in the alleged position as CAP Planner SRS THES this fall. |