SSNGIS DR. RUSSELL W. CARRUTH DR. LIONEL G. DRECHSEL Ben Lomond Principal Ns . Planning Director JOHN ULIBARRI Minorities Specialist Sewer Board to Investigate | Extension of Line in Wilson — The governing board of Cen-|on the* entire system. (living outside a city.” tral Weber Sewer Improvement| Another suggestion concerning) No set amountwas ‘District decided Monday night) the system’s lines, and growing | upon. to make one last effort to help | out of the Wilson question, was; In four families in the Wilson area to raise the district’s connection) moved get a sewer The system. board is fee committed to| in unincorporated Families in such areas. areas /|$17,511 other action, decided the board to pay monthly bills of and heard a report by now!| Mr. Wangsgard on Sottth Ogden extend a trunk line as far west|pay $275 for hookup as com-|extension of the system in which as Pete’s Cafe, 2040 S. 1900 W. pared to around’ $500 for the|he noted the present outfall- line All four families live north of/same service: in cities, Mr.'could handle an additional 400 the cafe on 1900 West.in an al-'Boyce said, adding, ‘‘we|acres of homes based on 10 per most - imperceptible ho11o w/)shouldn’t subsidize them just for acre density. a which makes septic tank drain-| age almost impossible: most of | the year because of high water level. DEBATING ISSUE board, which -has . ‘The’ been. debating the issue since last summer, voted to continue with the trunk line and pump—bidding on the section has already | been completed—and try to get’ 'a low-cost bid for ‘construction of the smaller line north when the water table is lower. | In any case, the board de- icided unanimously, it is not go‘ing to set a precedent by installation of a collection line. Cost of construction and main- itenance of any collector line’ |would have, to be borne by the ifamilies form involved, their they own wanted, who could sub-district if board members: | insisted. | “Our district was organized’ ito provide outfall sewer service. This (line under discussion) is 1a collector system, and I doubt iif we legally could construct it | without infringing lof cities,” said | Leeuwen. | COLLECT SEWAGE difference between The | | | | fall and i icollect land on the rights George Van collector volume, out- lines—bothis sewage—is one explained of size Doren \Boyce, district manager. | “The line down outfall line and |15-inch pipe; Wilson is an utilizes it’s 12 to also a pres- four fam- }sure line, but the line you want is normal eight-inch sewer pipe,” Mr. Boyce said to the delegation from ‘Wilson. Problems of the ilies are compounded by two) facts; no other neighbors are willing to stand a. share of construction—none have the same water problem—and . the high water table drives construction costs up. Construction of a collector line would run each family about $610, estimated Lew Wangsgard, consulting engineer. He based his estimate on the low bid cost of $7.52 per lineal fgot. | In connection with the project, 'Mr. Wangsgard said the low bid |of Pollard Inc. of West Jordan jon the trunk line—Schedule A— ‘had been approved and work is -expected to begin later this week. ! | MAIN. The lished TOPIC district’s lines, estabas the main topic from ‘the meeting’s start, took up the ‘bulk of the session. | A report by treatment plant office manager Ted Ear! on De- cember’s total ‘treatment iboard, was but processing approved started and by the discussion when Mr. Van Leeuwen noticed ithe daily total for Dec. 25 was 55 million gallons, 20 million gallons higher than an extreme- ‘ly high winter daily average. | Board members speculated that some homes on the system fare disposing of their excess surface water t) al} Ne into sewer ANSON A ome lines,| eT) ss